Most companies are sitting on roughly 40% more value than their financial statements reveal, hidden inside their sustainability performance.
Verdalor finds it, puts a number on it, and turns it into board-ready financial metrics, so the value you have already built finally shows up where it counts. The live model below runs on one anonymised company. Drag the carbon price and watch the number move.
Your balance sheet is understating the business by around 40%. We quantify the value your sustainability work is already creating and report it in financial terms you can defend, so you stop leaving real worth off the books.
You know your sustainability work creates real value. We prove it in the one language the board cannot argue with: money. Your impact, finally counted as value created, not cost incurred.
Two views of the same company. One asks did this year pay for itself once you price the environmental cost. The other asks is the whole company worth more or less once you bring that value onto the books. This sits beside your accounts, priced in euros, built to survive due diligence. Drag the price and watch.
This is the price regulators and investors will assign to every tonne of CO2 your business emits. Higher price, bigger liability. Your market is catching up fast.
The rate used to convert future carbon costs into today's money. A lower rate takes long-term stewardship seriously. A higher rate mirrors standard finance. The difference changes your complete value by more than you expect.
The enterprise value baseline the integrated calculation benchmarks against. Toggle between market cap only, or market cap plus net debt. The gap between them can shift your complete value significantly.
The balance sheet view is available on a wider screen. The number above already tells you whether this year paid for itself.
Illustrative only. Built from one company's public report, anonymised and rerun under the IIAF methodology. Conservative, sourced inputs, with gaps flagged rather than estimated. Not GAAP or IFRS. The point is simple: your finance team should own this number before the market does.
See the method →Every strong brand stands against something. We stand against lazy capitalism: the habit of measuring only what the old templates make easy, and dismissing the rest as immeasurable. We are not against profit. We are against an incomplete view of it.
If your sustainability work cannot be read by your finance team, it is not a strategy. It is a report that the people holding the budget never read in financial terms.
Sustainability has a translation problem, not a data problem. You collect more environmental and social data than ever, yet most of it dies in a separate report the people holding the budget never read in financial terms. Here is what that quietly costs.
Work that genuinely strengthens the company shows up as expense, never as worth created.
The result lands in a disclosure your finance team cannot use, and the value you built stays off the books and out of the conversation that decides what you are worth.
Investors price what reaches the statements. They cannot price what never does.
Environmental cost exposure is real. People value is real. Societal value is real. None of it sits on your statements, so the market values part of the company, not the whole.
Capital gets allocated against a picture of the business missing a meaningful slice of reality.
The CFO speaks in money, the CSO speaks in impact, and the two numbers never meet. We exist to prove the rest is not immeasurable at all.
It starts where the CFO and the CSO are stuck, on opposite sides of the same translation gap, and ends with one number they share. The whole path runs on public information only. Click a tier in the dial to see how deep each level goes.
The main path needs nothing sensitive. When you are ready, add ERM data, confidential business cases and investment files to sharpen the number further. You choose if and when. It never touches the public spine.
At the end, the CFO holds three things, and not one of them is a sustainability document. One number stated like a financial result, the bridge that proves it, and a clear view of where you stand. Built to sit beside your audited accounts and survive the same questions.
The same waterfall you already present, now reconciling impact to earnings.
The value the market hasn't priced becomes a number you can put in front of investors and rating agencies.
Unpriced carbon, water and supply-chain exposure surfaces now, while you still have time to act on it cheaply.
Every major decision can be value-priced first, so spend flows to what actually builds complete value.
Finance and sustainability finally argue from the same page, so decisions get made instead of deferred.
Your sustainability work was recorded as cost, in a report your finance team could not use.
It is counted as value created, on a Complete P&L your finance team owns. Same data, in a language you can defend.
Figures illustrative and anonymised. The True EBITDA statement, value bridge and position view are produced under the IIAF methodology and are illustrative only, built to sit beside audited accounts but not a replacement for them. Non-GAAP / Non-IFRS.
The IIAF EBITDA Bridge and the CFO/CSO perspective are genuinely distinctive. The framing around the gap between financial and integrated performance is one of the most operationally useful I have seen.Willem Schramade · Professor, Nyenrode Business University · Head of Sustainability Client Advisory, Schroders
The IIAF method is conservative by design. It uses sourced numbers, flags gaps rather than filling them with guesses, and is built to survive a sceptical CFO, not to flatter a sustainability report.
Verdalor is the brand. The IIAF, the Integrated Impact Accounting Framework, is the engine beneath it. The brand is what you buy and remember. The engine is what makes the number defensible. It was built by Marcel Jacobs across twenty years inside Royal Philips, Philip Morris International and Office Depot Europe, watching where value goes uncounted, then learning to price it. The credibility markers below are the proof behind the promise.
Four products, one engine. Start light with a First Read, go deep with a Discovery, keep it live with Always On, and prove it cold when you raise. Each rung earns the next.
A fast public-data pass that sizes the gap between your reported number and your real one. The cheapest way to find out if the deeper work is worth it.
We run the Complete P&L beside your accounts and show the Unaccounted Value the official statements miss. You leave with the number and a clear view of what to do with it.
We sit with your Investment Committee each quarter. Every major spend gets value-priced before sign-off, so capital stops getting stranded in plain sight.
Listing, raising or selling? We prove the worth is real and build every document an investor needs to believe it, with the bridge that holds up in the room.
Wherever we make a claim, we show the working. Each figure below comes from a real analysis, recomputed under the IIAF and stripped of identifying detail. Conservative by design, with gaps flagged rather than estimated.
A business carrying almost no environmental cost exposure, yet whose real worth rests entirely on the durability of the people value it creates. We made that asset visible and defensible, and showed exactly which assumption the result hangs on.
The year paid for itself on the Complete P&L, yet the company was worth less on the books until the environmental cost exposure was repaired. Two views, one board that could finally act on both. Found before the raise, not after.
Close to break-even on its own operations, yet a gross product-use exposure many times earnings sat outside the headline. We isolated the efficiency benefit that offsets most of it, leaving the real transition liability the board needed to see, never netted away.
Illustrative only · Non-GAAP / Non-IFRS · All value drivers are IIAF estimates derived from public report data and are not for external disclosure. Environmental cost priced at the policy reference. Method foundation: Schoenmaker & Schramade (2023), Corporate Finance for Long-Term Value.
"Stop reporting on impact. Start accounting for value."
The full thinking behind the method, written for CFOs who are done flying blind. Not a sustainability book. A finance book that happens to take impact seriously enough to put a number on it.
Order on Amazon →Book a call and we will look at your business through the IIAF lens. Then we tell you, plainly, what your sustainability work is worth in financial terms and whether the deeper work makes sense for you.
Book a call →